Re: [apache-plusplus] Re: Process model for C++ Apache

[Dean Gaudet <dgaudet@arctic.org>]

On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Michael Anderson wrote:

> Why don't you start an product/architecture discussion for
> 2.0 in new-httpd - that issue is more general than C++ and
> needs to happen whatever the implementation language.
> 
> I'd do it but I haven't ever had any luck getting responses
> in that mailing list. I wonder it there isn't another list
> more appropriate?

new-httpd is appropriate... 

To be honest, I couldn't keep up with the volume you guys just posted here
in the past week though.  I had to delete a bunch of your "novel" length
messages :) 

But just so you know at least I haven't been totally ignoring you... take
a look at the flow thing I just posted to new-httpd.  Your input was
definately in there -- if only prodding me to the point of realising that
it could actually work... I've struggled with a design like it for ages,
but kept thinking "nah why bother, it can't be faster, can it?"  And then
you reminded me that thread stacks pollute L1 caches, and that was one of
the light bulbs I needed! 

Dean