Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> Ben Laurie (Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>) wrote:
> > Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> >> In article <35D318A7.86A7790B@algroup.co.uk> you wrote:
> >> >[...]
> >> >> So people, don't think about mod_ssl and Apache-SSL as competing packages.
> >> >> Think about them very similar you think about ECGS and GCC. The one part of
....lots of talk about Apache-ssl / mod_ssl....
> EGCS and no one does. Exactly the same applies to Apache-SSL and mod_ssl. I
> don't want to force someone to move from Apache-SSL to mod_ssl when he is
> still unable to see the benefits himself. (Oh, one more example: BeroFTPd and
> WU-FTPd - those who do not understand the benefits from the Autoconf interface
> and the cleanups in BeroFTPd should not try to move to BeroFTPd...)
> ....
Just a little side-note regarding ftpd:s that might be of interest to
the list:
Try out proftpd as a replacement for wu-ftpd; the early versions were
buggy, but
now (1.1.6) itīs getting *really* good. The config file syntax is very
similar to
apacheīs and allow for very advanced configurations.
http://www.proftpd.org