Re: [apache-ssl] Apache-SSL v mod_ssl
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [apache-ssl] Apache-SSL v mod_ssl



Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> 
> In article <003f01bdc786$dff0b080$1ffd1581@reactor.isc.rit.edu> you wrote:
> 
> >>New features are for instance APACI "make install" integration, automatic
> >>SSLeay location type recognition (source vs. installed package tree), etc.
> >>But also forthcoming features I'll add in the next weeks. But let us stop
> > this
> >>now, please. All those things are written down in mod_ssl's CHANGES file in
> >>great detail.  We don't have to repeat it here. Please!
> 
> >     That's funny -- I used APACI just fine with Apache-SSL, with minor
> > tweaking. make install worked beautifully.
> 
> I didn't said APACI doesn't work. I said Apache-SSL is not integrated into
> APACI. For instance gcache is not installed automatically; same for the
> created certificate of `make certificate', etc. That's what I meant.

Good grief. gcache not being installed is a bug, which is fixed in 1.21
(I hope). 
The certificate not being installed is not a bug. make certificate is
for demonstraction/debugging purposes only.

I think it is pretty extraordinary to base your arguments for mod_ssl on
a few minor bugs.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie            |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686| Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org/
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |
A.L. Digital Ltd,     |Apache-SSL author     http://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England.      |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache/

WE'RE RECRUITING! http://www.aldigital.co.uk/recruit/